Revert trim "fix"
This commit is contained in:
parent
8202e9922e
commit
d623528cc5
@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ yaw_moment_roll_rate_mach_table = 0:0
|
||||
elevator_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.85, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.85, 0.785:0.5 ; 0:1
|
||||
aileron_scaling_table = -0.785:1 ;0:1
|
||||
rudder_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.6, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.6, 0.785:0.5 ;0:1
|
||||
//KH From 3
|
||||
elevator_lift_coef=4
|
||||
elevator_lift_coef=3
|
||||
rudder_lift_coef=2
|
||||
aileron_load_factor_effectiveness_table = 0:1
|
||||
lift_coef_at_drag_zero = 0.1
|
||||
|
||||
@ -35,11 +35,6 @@ unchanged to allow to see the differences more easily.
|
||||
- SDK conformance
|
||||
- Affected by `fuel_flow_gain`
|
||||
- Set to zero as the SDK indicated one ought to
|
||||
- Full AND trim on climb and certain cruise conditions (aft CG, light weight)
|
||||
- Affected by `elevator_lift_coef`
|
||||
- Adjusted to increase AND trim effectiveness
|
||||
- I am unsure if this is truly a fix or my tests lead me astray
|
||||
- Adjustment is not a complete fix
|
||||
- Slat drag and approach N1
|
||||
- Affected by slat drag
|
||||
- Lowered `drag_scalar`
|
||||
@ -100,7 +95,9 @@ pitch kept rising. These flights were conducted with differing payloads, all of
|
||||
which set by the EFB, thus ensuring a valid CG.
|
||||
Given the MD-11 far back placement of the wing and the subsequent 1° AND vs.
|
||||
15.5° ANU trim limits, most flights would never use all of the AND trim
|
||||
authority. There seems to be some issue here.
|
||||
authority. There seems to be some issue here.
|
||||
I had tried a lot, but nothing conclusive. I see this as a limit of my
|
||||
understanding for MSFSs flight model configurations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Slat drag
|
||||
Users reported a strong pitch up momentum upon slat retraction, strong enough
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user