diff --git a/PackageSources/SimObjects/Airplanes/TFDi_Design_MD-11F_GE/flight_model.cfg b/PackageSources/SimObjects/Airplanes/TFDi_Design_MD-11F_GE/flight_model.cfg index 20ff5d8..65831ce 100644 --- a/PackageSources/SimObjects/Airplanes/TFDi_Design_MD-11F_GE/flight_model.cfg +++ b/PackageSources/SimObjects/Airplanes/TFDi_Design_MD-11F_GE/flight_model.cfg @@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ yaw_moment_roll_rate_mach_table = 0:0 elevator_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.85, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.85, 0.785:0.5 ; 0:1 aileron_scaling_table = -0.785:1 ;0:1 rudder_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.6, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.6, 0.785:0.5 ;0:1 -//KH From 3 -elevator_lift_coef=4 +elevator_lift_coef=3 rudder_lift_coef=2 aileron_load_factor_effectiveness_table = 0:1 lift_coef_at_drag_zero = 0.1 diff --git a/README.MD b/README.MD index 8d88e88..5ff9579 100644 --- a/README.MD +++ b/README.MD @@ -35,11 +35,6 @@ unchanged to allow to see the differences more easily. - SDK conformance - Affected by `fuel_flow_gain` - Set to zero as the SDK indicated one ought to -- Full AND trim on climb and certain cruise conditions (aft CG, light weight) - - Affected by `elevator_lift_coef` - - Adjusted to increase AND trim effectiveness - - I am unsure if this is truly a fix or my tests lead me astray - - Adjustment is not a complete fix - Slat drag and approach N1 - Affected by slat drag - Lowered `drag_scalar` @@ -100,7 +95,9 @@ pitch kept rising. These flights were conducted with differing payloads, all of which set by the EFB, thus ensuring a valid CG. Given the MD-11 far back placement of the wing and the subsequent 1° AND vs. 15.5° ANU trim limits, most flights would never use all of the AND trim -authority. There seems to be some issue here. +authority. There seems to be some issue here. +I had tried a lot, but nothing conclusive. I see this as a limit of my +understanding for MSFSs flight model configurations. ## Slat drag Users reported a strong pitch up momentum upon slat retraction, strong enough