TFDi_MD-11_QA/xkhofmann-tfdidesign-md11-config-tweaks
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Revert trim "fix"

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kilian Hofmann 2025-02-16 01:35:26 +01:00
parent 8202e9922e
commit d623528cc5
2 changed files with 4 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
PackageSources/SimObjects/Airplanes/TFDi_Design_MD-11F_GE/flight_model.cfg
View File

@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ yaw_moment_roll_rate_mach_table = 0:0
elevator_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.85, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.85, 0.785:0.5 ; 0:1 elevator_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.85, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.85, 0.785:0.5 ; 0:1
aileron_scaling_table = -0.785:1 ;0:1 aileron_scaling_table = -0.785:1 ;0:1
rudder_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.6, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.6, 0.785:0.5 ;0:1 rudder_scaling_table = -0.785:0.5, -0.524:0.6, -0.175:0.9, 0:1, 0.175:0.9, 0.524:0.6, 0.785:0.5 ;0:1
//KH From 3 elevator_lift_coef=3
elevator_lift_coef=4
rudder_lift_coef=2 rudder_lift_coef=2
aileron_load_factor_effectiveness_table = 0:1 aileron_load_factor_effectiveness_table = 0:1
lift_coef_at_drag_zero = 0.1 lift_coef_at_drag_zero = 0.1

7
README.MD
View File

@ -35,11 +35,6 @@ unchanged to allow to see the differences more easily.
- SDK conformance - SDK conformance
- Affected by `fuel_flow_gain` - Affected by `fuel_flow_gain`
- Set to zero as the SDK indicated one ought to - Set to zero as the SDK indicated one ought to
- Full AND trim on climb and certain cruise conditions (aft CG, light weight)
- Affected by `elevator_lift_coef`
- Adjusted to increase AND trim effectiveness
- I am unsure if this is truly a fix or my tests lead me astray
- Adjustment is not a complete fix
- Slat drag and approach N1 - Slat drag and approach N1
- Affected by slat drag - Affected by slat drag
- Lowered `drag_scalar` - Lowered `drag_scalar`
@ -101,6 +96,8 @@ which set by the EFB, thus ensuring a valid CG.
Given the MD-11 far back placement of the wing and the subsequent 1° AND vs. Given the MD-11 far back placement of the wing and the subsequent 1° AND vs.
15.5° ANU trim limits, most flights would never use all of the AND trim 15.5° ANU trim limits, most flights would never use all of the AND trim
authority. There seems to be some issue here. authority. There seems to be some issue here.
I had tried a lot, but nothing conclusive. I see this as a limit of my
understanding for MSFSs flight model configurations.
## Slat drag ## Slat drag
Users reported a strong pitch up momentum upon slat retraction, strong enough Users reported a strong pitch up momentum upon slat retraction, strong enough